Silver and Black Points
Oct. 15th, 2007 03:15 pmHere are a few deals from clubs and sectionals. Even though I'm an A's fan, the title wasn't a Raiders reference.
Playing 10-12 notrumps brings a lot of fun and excitement to a dull club or sectional session. When they smack you for penalties, especially at matchpoints, trying to get out for a few points less than their game is a big thrill. More on that, later. My favorite part, though, is talking about the runout sequences after the game. Here's my favorite so far:
1N-X-2C-X, XX-P-2D-P, P-X-P-P, XX-P-2H-P, P-X-P-P, 2S-P-P-X, P-P-P
If I had wanted to stretch things out, I could have redoubled and let pard play 2S. We made 2SX, btw, but that's not the fun part. I think they're cold for 4H anyway.
Yesterday I played swiss and we had this auction:
1C-P-1D-P, 1H-1S
RHO insisted that 1S showed primary clubs, otherwise he would have bid the previous round. Fine, as long as you've read all the bridge world magazines from the early 60's (he has, I have) and so has your partner (his hasn't, mine haven't). Oh well. Last week I had this auction:
P-1C-P-1H, P-1S-2D with 62 9 AJ975 AKQ93, and pard wanted to know why I had passed the first round. Sigh.
11) 1st, none
AQ972 T J864 Q43
- AK52 AKQ93 AJT6
1D-1S, 2H-3D, 4C-4H, 5H-6D, P
How do you play on a spade lead? If you play SQ, RHO covers. Since it was matchpoints I wanted to try to make seven, so I ruffed, HA, H ruff, DA, H ruff, DJ (trumps were 3-1), SA pitching a club, run CQ. Turns out RHO started with three diamonds and a stiff club, so I was about to go minus, but LHO didn't return a club. Weird. Against expert opps, perhaps LHO might have ducked the first club from Kxxx, and then given his partner a ruff. Against near experts, if they tried this, they'd probably give away the show.
So, did I misplay it?
3) 1st, favorable
AKx KQ97xx Tx Tx
QJx T8x QJx KQJx
We bid 1N-2D, 2H-4H, P. Even though we don't play 4H as a slam try, I still think it was an overbid, though I guess I would have bid 4H, at matchpoints, just to stay with the field.
Please note that I only opened 1N because it was 10-12. I wouldn't have considered a 12-14 NT or, heaven help me, 1C. I canvassed a few people around the room and they all opened. Monkeys.
Anyway, half the field went down, the rest made four or five (not all in game) or squeezed out a +1400. Just another day at the club. I, however, was the only player with the mad skillz to find a way to go down three. Observe:
LHO cashed DAK, CA, so now, at best, I can swing a 2.5 on an 11 top. Then he exited with a club and I led to HK as RHO pitched. Oops. Luckily, I'm all about the Dentist's coup. I know that if I play a spade to my hand and lead HT LHO can win HA and exit a spade, locking me in dummy for down two. I won't fall for that. The correct play is to cash SA, SQ, THEN lead HT. When LHO has a doubleton spade he has to exit a minor, and I can pitch SK, win in hand, and draw trump with a marked finesse. Note that, on the auction, it's far more likely LHO has three spades, but if I cash SA, SQ, CK pitching SK, I can't win ANY plain suit exit in hand since dummy will be trump tight.
Here's a hand I played a few weeks ago, and pard put it on his blog.
23) 1st, both
Txx xxxxx xx xxx
AKQxxx AQ xx AJT
1S-P-P-2D, 3D-P-3S-P, P-P
They cashed two diamonds and RHO played S9. I cashed SAK (trumps broke 2-2) and I had a decision to make. I had one entry to dummy, so I could take the heart hook, or I could try to catch CKQ on my right (or a doubleton honor). The heart hook seemed more promising. So, to enjoy the vig, I led CJ and stared down LHO. He won CQ and was endplayed. He exited a club and I could go to dummy for the heart hook anyway (it was off) trying to make four. Please note that I'd go down without the extra chance in clubs. Also note that if LHO ducked (not smoothly) I could win RHO's round return and try to throw in LHO in that suit, if I judged the card's lay foul. Also, also note that if LHO ducked smoothly I can finesse the round suit RHO returns and still get to dummy to try the other finesse. Pretty sweet, I thought.
I have a convention I insist on with all my partners: Keller. Like Helen. No talking about bridge during a session. Part of the reason is that when you spot analyze a hand (ok, maybe not when YOU do, but when my partner or I do) you might make a tiny (or huge) error and look stupid. Even worse, you might be right and make partner feel bad. Not what you want to do during a session. Finally, the main point of a post-mortem is to improve, and attacking before he gets to write down the score fires off defensiveness that gets in the way. I mention this because pard's congratulations on my brilliance went like this:
Why didn't you go to dummy, take a club finesse, and enjoy the 100% play?
He sounded so convincing I panicked and told him my play was better since I had significant chances to make an overtrick, at matchpoints. True, but more importantly his play was 24%, since they could exit passively in diamonds after I play off dummy's last trump.
Playing 10-12 notrumps brings a lot of fun and excitement to a dull club or sectional session. When they smack you for penalties, especially at matchpoints, trying to get out for a few points less than their game is a big thrill. More on that, later. My favorite part, though, is talking about the runout sequences after the game. Here's my favorite so far:
1N-X-2C-X, XX-P-2D-P, P-X-P-P, XX-P-2H-P, P-X-P-P, 2S-P-P-X, P-P-P
If I had wanted to stretch things out, I could have redoubled and let pard play 2S. We made 2SX, btw, but that's not the fun part. I think they're cold for 4H anyway.
Yesterday I played swiss and we had this auction:
1C-P-1D-P, 1H-1S
RHO insisted that 1S showed primary clubs, otherwise he would have bid the previous round. Fine, as long as you've read all the bridge world magazines from the early 60's (he has, I have) and so has your partner (his hasn't, mine haven't). Oh well. Last week I had this auction:
P-1C-P-1H, P-1S-2D with 62 9 AJ975 AKQ93, and pard wanted to know why I had passed the first round. Sigh.
11) 1st, none
AQ972 T J864 Q43
- AK52 AKQ93 AJT6
1D-1S, 2H-3D, 4C-4H, 5H-6D, P
How do you play on a spade lead? If you play SQ, RHO covers. Since it was matchpoints I wanted to try to make seven, so I ruffed, HA, H ruff, DA, H ruff, DJ (trumps were 3-1), SA pitching a club, run CQ. Turns out RHO started with three diamonds and a stiff club, so I was about to go minus, but LHO didn't return a club. Weird. Against expert opps, perhaps LHO might have ducked the first club from Kxxx, and then given his partner a ruff. Against near experts, if they tried this, they'd probably give away the show.
So, did I misplay it?
3) 1st, favorable
AKx KQ97xx Tx Tx
QJx T8x QJx KQJx
We bid 1N-2D, 2H-4H, P. Even though we don't play 4H as a slam try, I still think it was an overbid, though I guess I would have bid 4H, at matchpoints, just to stay with the field.
Please note that I only opened 1N because it was 10-12. I wouldn't have considered a 12-14 NT or, heaven help me, 1C. I canvassed a few people around the room and they all opened. Monkeys.
Anyway, half the field went down, the rest made four or five (not all in game) or squeezed out a +1400. Just another day at the club. I, however, was the only player with the mad skillz to find a way to go down three. Observe:
LHO cashed DAK, CA, so now, at best, I can swing a 2.5 on an 11 top. Then he exited with a club and I led to HK as RHO pitched. Oops. Luckily, I'm all about the Dentist's coup. I know that if I play a spade to my hand and lead HT LHO can win HA and exit a spade, locking me in dummy for down two. I won't fall for that. The correct play is to cash SA, SQ, THEN lead HT. When LHO has a doubleton spade he has to exit a minor, and I can pitch SK, win in hand, and draw trump with a marked finesse. Note that, on the auction, it's far more likely LHO has three spades, but if I cash SA, SQ, CK pitching SK, I can't win ANY plain suit exit in hand since dummy will be trump tight.
Here's a hand I played a few weeks ago, and pard put it on his blog.
23) 1st, both
Txx xxxxx xx xxx
AKQxxx AQ xx AJT
1S-P-P-2D, 3D-P-3S-P, P-P
They cashed two diamonds and RHO played S9. I cashed SAK (trumps broke 2-2) and I had a decision to make. I had one entry to dummy, so I could take the heart hook, or I could try to catch CKQ on my right (or a doubleton honor). The heart hook seemed more promising. So, to enjoy the vig, I led CJ and stared down LHO. He won CQ and was endplayed. He exited a club and I could go to dummy for the heart hook anyway (it was off) trying to make four. Please note that I'd go down without the extra chance in clubs. Also note that if LHO ducked (not smoothly) I could win RHO's round return and try to throw in LHO in that suit, if I judged the card's lay foul. Also, also note that if LHO ducked smoothly I can finesse the round suit RHO returns and still get to dummy to try the other finesse. Pretty sweet, I thought.
I have a convention I insist on with all my partners: Keller. Like Helen. No talking about bridge during a session. Part of the reason is that when you spot analyze a hand (ok, maybe not when YOU do, but when my partner or I do) you might make a tiny (or huge) error and look stupid. Even worse, you might be right and make partner feel bad. Not what you want to do during a session. Finally, the main point of a post-mortem is to improve, and attacking before he gets to write down the score fires off defensiveness that gets in the way. I mention this because pard's congratulations on my brilliance went like this:
Why didn't you go to dummy, take a club finesse, and enjoy the 100% play?
He sounded so convincing I panicked and told him my play was better since I had significant chances to make an overtrick, at matchpoints. True, but more importantly his play was 24%, since they could exit passively in diamonds after I play off dummy's last trump.